Non-binary gender, vulnerable populations and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the COVID-19 MEntal health inTernational for the general population (COMET-G) study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant mental health challenges, particularly for vulnerable populations, including non-binary gender individuals. The COMET international study aimed to investigate specific risk factors for clinical depression or distress during the pandemic, also in these special populations. METHODS: Chi-square tests were used for initial screening to select only those variables which would show an initial significance. Risk Ratios (RR) were calculated, and a Multiple Backward Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis (MBSLRA) was followed with those variables given significant results at screening and with the presence of distress or depression or the lack of both of them. RESULTS: The most important risk factors for depression were female (RR = 1.59-5.49) and non-binary gender (RR = 1.56-7.41), unemployment (RR = 1.41-6.57), not working during lockdowns (RR = 1.43-5.79), bad general health (RR = 2.74-9.98), chronic somatic disorder (RR = 1.22-5.57), history of mental disorders (depression RR = 2.31-9.47; suicide attempt RR = 2.33-9.75; psychosis RR = 2.14-10.08; Bipolar disorder RR = 2.75-12.86), smoking status (RR = 1.15-5.31) and substance use (RR = 1.77-8.01). The risk factors for distress or depression that survived MBSLRA were younger age, being widowed, living alone, bad general health, being a carer, chronic somatic disorder, not working during lockdowns, being single, self-reported history of depression, bipolar disorder, self-harm, suicide attempts and of other mental disorders, smoking, alcohol, and substance use. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted preventive interventions are crucial to safeguard the mental health of vulnerable groups, emphasizing the importance of diverse samples in future research. LIMITATIONS: Online data collection may have resulted in the underrepresentation of certain population groups.

Somatic multicomorbidity and disability in patients with psychiatric disorders in comparison to the general population: a quasi-epidemiological investigation in 54,826 subjects from 40 countries (COMET-G study).

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of medical illnesses is high among patients with psychiatric disorders. The current study aimed to investigate multi-comorbidity in patients with psychiatric disorders in comparison to the general population. Secondary aims were to investigate factors associated with metabolic syndrome and treatment appropriateness of mental disorders. METHODS: The sample included 54,826 subjects (64.73% females; 34.15% males; 1.11% nonbinary gender) from 40 countries (COMET-G study). The analysis was based on the registration of previous history that could serve as a fair approximation for the lifetime prevalence of various medical conditions. RESULTS: About 24.5% reported a history of somatic and 26.14% of mental disorders. Mental disorders were by far the most prevalent group of medical conditions. Comorbidity of any somatic with any mental disorder was reported by 8.21%. One-third to almost two-thirds of somatic patients were also suffering from a mental disorder depending on the severity and multicomorbidity. Bipolar and psychotic patients and to a lesser extent depressives, manifested an earlier (15-20 years) manifestation of somatic multicomorbidity, severe disability, and probably earlier death. The overwhelming majority of patients with mental disorders were not receiving treatment or were being treated in a way that was not recommended. Antipsychotics and antidepressants were not related to the development of metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that one-third to almost two-thirds of somatic patients also suffered from a mental disorder strongly suggests that psychiatry is the field with the most trans-specialty and interdisciplinary value and application points to the importance of teaching psychiatry and mental health in medical schools and also to the need for more technocratically oriented training of psychiatric residents.

BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphisms as a predictor for clinical presentation in schizophrenia - recent findings.

Schizophrenia is a highly heritable, severe psychiatric disorder that involves dysfunctions in thinking, emotions, and behavior, with a profound impact on a person's ability to function normally in their daily life. Research efforts continue to focus on elucidating possible genetic underlying mechanisms of the disorder. Although the genetic loci identified to date to be significantly associated with schizophrenia risk do not represent disease-causing factors, each one of them could be seen as a possible incremental contributor. Considering the importance of finding new and more efficient pharmacological approaches to target the complex symptomatology of this disorder, in this scoping review, we are focusing on the most recent findings in studies aiming to elucidate the contribution of one of the genetic factors involved - the BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphisms. Here we performed a systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases with the search terms: (BDNF gene polymorphism) AND (schizophrenia) for articles published in the last 5 years. To be selected for this review, articles had to report on studies where genotyping for the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism was performed in participants diagnosed with schizophrenia (or schizophrenia spectrum disorders or first-episode psychosis). The search provided 35 results from Pubmed, 134 results from Embase, and 118 results from the Web of Science database. Twenty-two articles were selected to be included in this review, all reporting on studies where an implication of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphisms in the disorder's pathophysiology was sought to be elucidated. These studies looked at BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphism variants, their interactions with other genes of interest, and different facets of the illness. The Met/Met genotype was found to be associated with higher PANSS positive scores. Furthermore, Met/Met homozygous individuals appear to present with worse cognitive function and lower levels of serum BDNF. In the Val/Val genotype carriers, increased BDNF levels were found to correlate with weight gain under Risperidone treatment. However, due to heterogeneous results, the diversity in study populations and studies' small sample sizes, generalizations cannot be made. Our findings emphasize the need for further research dedicated to clarifying the role of gene polymorphisms in antipsychotic treatment to enhance specificity and efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Cortisol and cytokines in schizophrenia: A scoping review.

Background: With a complex etiology and chronic, disabling evolution, schizophrenia continues to represent a challenge for patients, clinicians, and researchers alike. Recent emphasis in research on finding practical blood-based biomarkers for diagnosis improvement, disease development prediction, and therapeutic response monitoring in schizophrenia, led to studies aiming at elucidating a connection between stress and inflammation markers. Methods: We set here to explore recent literature aiming to understand the connection between cytokines and cortisol level changes in individuals with schizophrenia and their potential relevance as markers of clinical improvement under treatment. A search was completed in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and APAPsycInfo databases with search terms: (cytokines) AND (cortisol) AND (schizophrenia). This provided 43 results from Pubmed, 82 results from Embase, 52 results from Web of Science, and 9 results from APA PsycInfo. After removing articles not fitting the criteria, 13 articles were selected. Results: While all studies included assess cortisol levels in individuals with schizophrenia, most of them included a healthy control group for comparisons there is diversity in the inflammation markers assessed - the most frequent being the IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α. Eleven of the 13 studies compare stress and inflammatory markers in individuals with schizophrenia to healthy controls, one study compares two subgroups of patients with schizophrenia, and one study compares pre- and post-measures in the same group of individuals with schizophrenia. Conclusions: The focus of the studies within the topic is diverse. Many of the selected studies found correlations between cortisol and inflammation markers, however, the direction of correlation and inflammatory markers included differed. A variety of mechanisms behind cortisol and immunological changes associated with schizophrenia were considered. Evidence was found in these studies to suggest that biological immune and stress markers may be associated with clinical improvement in participants with schizophrenia, however, the exact mechanisms remain to be determined.

Is befriending a valuable intervention in schizophrenia? A scoping review.

Background: Schizophrenia is a severe, chronic mental disorder that involves disruptions in cognitive processes, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions. Psychotherapeutic and social integration practices have increasingly been added to the pharmacological treatment in an effort to improve the level of functioning and the quality of life of individuals affected by this condition. Befriending, defined as a one-on-one companionship provided by a volunteer who aims to act as an emotionally supportive liaison, is hypothesized to be an effective such intervention, offering support for building and maintaining social relationships in the community. Despite its increase in popularity and acceptance, befriending remains poorly understood and under-researched. Methods: We performed a systematic search for studies targeting befriending either as an intervention or a controlled condition in studies on schizophrenia. Searches were performed in four databases: APA PsycInfo, Pubmed, Medline and EBSCO. The keywords "schizophrenia," AND "befriending," were searched for on all databases. Results: The search yielded 93 titles and abstracts, of which 18 met the criteria for inclusion. The studies included in this review have all incorporated befriending as an intervention or a controlled condition, as per our search criteria, and aimed at depicting the value and feasibility of this intervention to address social and clinical deficits in individuals with schizophrenia. Conclusion: The studies selected for this scoping review revealed inconsistent findings regarding the effect of befriending on overall symptoms and the subjective reporting of quality of life in individuals with schizophrenia. This inconsistency may be attributed to differences between the studies and their specific limitations.

Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the health professionals (COMET-HP) study: depression, suicidal tendencies and conspiracism.

INTRODUCTION: The current study aimed to investigate the rates of anxiety, clinical depression, and suicidality and their changes in health professionals during the COVID-19 outbreak. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data came from the larger COMET-G study. The study sample includes 12,792 health professionals from 40 countries (62.40% women aged 39.76 ± 11.70; 36.81% men aged 35.91 ± 11.00 and 0.78% non-binary gender aged 35.15 ± 13.03). Distress and clinical depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm, respectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi-square tests, multiple forward stepwise linear regression analyses, and Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested relations among variables. RESULTS: Clinical depression was detected in 13.16% with male doctors and 'non-binary genders' having the lowest rates (7.89 and 5.88% respectively) and 'non-binary gender' nurses and administrative staff had the highest (37.50%); distress was present in 15.19%. A significant percentage reported a deterioration in mental state, family dynamics, and everyday lifestyle. Persons with a history of mental disorders had higher rates of current depression (24.64% vs. 9.62%; p < 0.0001). Suicidal tendencies were at least doubled in terms of RASS scores. Approximately one-third of participants were accepting (at least to a moderate degree) a non-bizarre conspiracy. The highest Relative Risk (RR) to develop clinical depression was associated with a history of Bipolar disorder (RR = 4.23). CONCLUSIONS: The current study reported findings in health care professionals similar in magnitude and quality to those reported earlier in the general population although rates of clinical depression, suicidal tendencies, and adherence to conspiracy theories were much lower. However, the general model of factors interplay seems to be the same and this could be of practical utility since many of these factors are modifiable.

Possible predictors of Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in the psychiatric population - A scoping review.

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic brought vaccination to the front of the series of measures implemented to address the chain-reaction outbreaks that continue to cause loss and suffering. In spite of its proven efficacy, a considerable percentage of the population remains hesitant or right-out opposed. A need for informing public health strategies not only in regards to the current pandemic but for future similar developments remains of utmost importance for researchers and clinicians alike, especially when it comes to vulnerable categories of population. Identifying risk factors associated with vaccine hesitancy in the psychiatric population is the aim of this scoping review. Methods: We performed a systematic search on the topic of Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in relation to psychiatric disorders, using three databases: Medline, PubMed and Embase. Inclusion criteria focused on studies looking at individuals with a psychiatric disorder in the context of the Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy where possible determinant factors were discussed. Results: Fifteen articles out of 219 publications on the topic of Covid 19 vaccine hesitancy met our inclusion criteria for this review. The common findings of these studies recognize the following risk factors for Covid 19 hesitancy: diagnosis of severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, lower socioeconomic status, lower educational level, and young age. Conclusions: Our findings may contribute to the proactive development of educational strategies targeting the psychiatric population in the context of cultural, ethnic, age and gender diversity, in order to safeguard the wellbeing of all when facing pandemic events. Overarching future directions include creating vaccination promotion strategies specific for the psychiatric population.

COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health and Life Habits in the Canadian Population.

Objectives: The study aims to investigate the rate of clinical depression in the adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the changes in anxiety, distress, suicidal ideation, and their relations with several personal and interpersonal/social variables. Methods: This is an epidemiological, non-interventional study. It is part of an international multi-center study, with the main site at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, in Greece (COMET-G Study). We are presenting aspects of the research involving the Canadian site, based on 508 Canadian responders to the online survey (QAIRE). Results: Of the 508 responders, 72.2% were females aged 42.57 ± 14.00 years; 27.2% were males aged 42.24 ± 15.49 years; and 0.6% were others aged 46.33 ± 17.79 years. Increased anxiety during the lockdown was reported by 69.3% of those surveyed. The rate of suicidal thoughts increased in 19.5% of participants during the lockdown. Depression was reported by 22% of responders, while distress was present in 18.4%. We found a greater prevalence of depression, but not distress, in individuals with a history of any mental disorder. Based on the multiple regression analysis, we found four CORE factors equally influencing the changes in mental health during the lockdown (gender, quality of sleep, family conflicts, and changes in daily routine). In the Canadian population, two major changes acted as protective factors, significantly expressed when compared with the worldwide tendencies: fewer financial difficulties; and an increase in religious beliefs. Conclusion: The rate of major depression, distress, and suicidal ideation was higher in Canadians than in the worldwide population (per COMET-G), but the relative risk to develop depression in the presence of a history of mental disorders was lower. Almost 90% of Canadians believed in the real story of COVID source of provenience.

The effect of different degrees of lockdown and self-identified gender on anxiety, depression and suicidality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the international COMET-G study.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic various degrees of lockdown were applied by countries around the world. It is considered that such measures have an adverse effect on mental health but the relationship of measure intensity with the mental health effect has not been thoroughly studied. Here we report data from the larger COMET-G study pertaining to this question. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, data were gathered with an online questionnaire from 55,589 participants from 40 countries (64.85% females aged 35.80 ± 13.61; 34.05% males aged 34.90±13.29 and 1.10% other aged 31.64±13.15). Anxiety was measured with the STAI, depression with the CES-D and suicidality with the RASS. Distress and probable depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm respectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: It included the calculation of Relative Risk (RR), Factorial ANOVA and Multiple backwards stepwise linear regression analysis RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds were currently living under significant restrictions due to lockdown. For both males and females the risk to develop clinical depression correlated significantly with each and every level of increasing lockdown degree (RR 1.72 and 1.90 respectively). The combined lockdown and psychiatric history increased RR to 6.88 The overall relationship of lockdown with severity of depression, though significant was small. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the first which reports an almost linear relationship between lockdown degree and effect in mental health. Our findings, support previous suggestions concerning the need for a proactive targeted intervention to protect mental health more specifically in vulnerable groups.

Findings, limitations and new directions in tACS studies in schizophrenia research: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia (SZ) is a severe neurodevelopmental spectrum disorder with significant consequences for the individual who is diagnosed and their family, resulting in notable system-level costs associated with the current methods of treatment. With a complex etiology, this syndrome continues to evade our thorough understanding and invites cautious analysis into how the newest research findings may translate into meaningful interventions. Recent explorations of non-invasive interventions in psychiatry suggest that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a safe and potentially promising add-on to the current SZ treatment. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search for tACS studies on SZ in three databases - Embase, Pubmed and Medline. The search yielded 29 titles and abstracts, of which 8 met the criteria for inclusion: experimental use of tACS on patients with SZ. RESULTS: We found 8 publications where findings from tACS were applied on participants with SZ. The most common frequencies used were theta (4.5 Hertz [Hz] and 6 Hz), alpha (10 Hz) and gamma (40 Hz). The main findings resulting from tACS delivery were: (1) decrease in auditory hallucinations; (2) decrease in negative symptoms; (3) cognitive improvement; and, (4) no change. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review provides a highlight of current protocols used in tACS studies on SZ, their main findings and limitations, and points towards a direction for new approaches. The wide variety of objectives, protocols and assessments used by researchers demonstrates the diversified nature of research currently used in this field, suggesting the need for a more thorough exploration as results continue to emerge.

Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study.

INTRODUCTION: There are few published empirical data on the effects of COVID-19 on mental health, and until now, there is no large international study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, an online questionnaire gathered data from 55,589 participants from 40 countries (64.85% females aged 35.80 ± 13.61; 34.05% males aged 34.90±13.29 and 1.10% other aged 31.64±13.15). Distress and probable depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm respectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi-square tests, multiple forward stepwise linear regression analyses and Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested relations among variables. RESULTS: Probable depression was detected in 17.80% and distress in 16.71%. A significant percentage reported a deterioration in mental state, family dynamics and everyday lifestyle. Persons with a history of mental disorders had higher rates of current depression (31.82% vs. 13.07%). At least half of participants were accepting (at least to a moderate degree) a non-bizarre conspiracy. The highest Relative Risk (RR) to develop depression was associated with history of Bipolar disorder and self-harm/attempts (RR = 5.88). Suicidality was not increased in persons without a history of any mental disorder. Based on these results a model was developed. CONCLUSIONS: The final model revealed multiple vulnerabilities and an interplay leading from simple anxiety to probable depression and suicidality through distress. This could be of practical utility since many of these factors are modifiable. Future research and interventions should specifically focus on them.

The effect of two antidiarrhoeal drugs on the psychosocial adjustment to illness in chronic functional diarrhoea.

BACKGROUND: Chronic functional diarrhea is an embarrassing symptom, causing the impairment of the quality of life. AIM: We looked for the effect of two antidiarrheal drugs, diosmectite and loperamide on the psychosocial adjustment to illness, a predictor for the health-related quality of life, in chronic functional diarrhea. METHODS: Prospective controlled randomized trial including 50 consecutive patients with chronic functional diarrhea. They received either diosmectite 3 g b.i.d (n=25, 11M/14F, age 43+/-12 years) or loperamide 2 mg b.i.d. (n=25, 12M/13F, 47+/-11 years) for 2 weeks. Diarrhea and four other digestive symptoms were evaluated on a 0-16 scale, as well as patient's satisfaction (scale 1-10) and physician's satisfaction (scale 0-4). Psychosocial adjustment to illness was assessed with the PAIS-SR scale. RESULTS: Symptom score for diarrhea was reduced from 10.5+/-5.7 to 2.6+/-1.2 (mean+/-SD), p<0.001 by diosmectite and from 8.5+/-4.2 to 1.2+/-0.6, p<0.0001 by loperamide. Diosmectite had a stronger effect than loperamide on accompanying pain (p<0.05) and bloating (p<0.01), but not on nausea, anorexia and emesis. The overall ratings of the patient's satisfaction (8.7+/-0.9 vs. 8.2+/-1.1, NS) and physician's satisfaction (3.2+/-0.3 vs. 3.1+/-0.4, NS) were similar. Psychological adjustment to illness was not changed for following items: health care orientation and domestic environment. Diosmectite improved more than loperamide the psychological distress (from 12.7+/-3.8 to 7.7+/-2.1 vs. 11.8+/-3.3 to 9.05+/-2.2, p<0.05), vocational environment (from 3.2+/-1.1 to 2.2+/-1.2 vs. 3.3+/-1.2 to 3.4+/-1.5, p<0.05) and sexual relationship scores (from 6.4+/-2.2 to 3.0+/-1.5 vs. 7.2+/-2.2 to 5.5+/-2.1, p<0.05). Both drugs similarly improved the items: family relationship and social environment. CONCLUSIONS: Diosmectite and loperamide are both potent drugs for chronic functional diarrhea. Diosmectite has better effects on associated symptoms and some items of psychosocial adjustment to illness (distress, sexual activity and vocational environment).